HUBUNGAN KONFLIK TERHADAP PROFESIONALITAS KERJA GURU UPT SMPN 10 TAPUNG KABUPATEN KAMPAR

Authors

  • Sri Agustina Ratnawati Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Riau
  • Ria Rafianti Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Riau
  • Refli Surya Barkara Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Riau
  • Muhammad Afrillyan Dwi Syahputra Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Riau

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between work conflict and teacher professionalism in schools, particularly its impact on the quality of individual and organizational performance. Poorly managed work conflicts can disrupt professionalism, such as by reducing commitment, hindering collaboration, or lowering adherence to work standards. Conversely, a high level of professionalism can be a key factor in resolving work conflicts constructively, as professionalism includes the ability to communicate effectively, maintain work ethics, and prioritize shared interests. Therefore, the author is interested in examining the topic "The Relationship Between Conflict and Teacher Professionalism at UPT SMPN 10 Tapung, Kampar Regency." The sample for this study consists of 28 teachers. The results of a simple correlation analysis (r) indicate a correlation between teachers' perceptions of the relationship between conflict and teacher professionalism, with an (r) value of 0.853 and a significance level of 0.05 (5%). This shows a positive relationship, as a higher conflict level correlates with lower teacher professionalism. It can be concluded that the relationship between conflict and teacher professionalism falls into the "very strong" category, with a coefficient range of 0.80–1.00. Thus, it can be stated that interpersonal conflicts are related to teacher professionalism at UPT SMPN 10 Tapung, Kampar Regency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Babbie, E. (2013). The Practice of Social Research. Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Coser, L. A. (1956). The Functions of Social Conflict. Free Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. Stanford University Press.

Hamalik, O. (2006). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bumi Aksara.

Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2008). Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice. McGraw-Hill.

Kerlinger, F. N. (2006). Foundations of Behavioral Research. Fort Worth: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1848). The Communist Manifesto. Penguin Classics.

Mathis, R. L., & Jackson, J. H. (2011). Human Resource Management. South-Western Cengage Learning.

Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston: Pearson Education.

Simmel, G. (1955). Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations. Free Press.

Soekanto, S. (1982). Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Rajawali Press.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Susanto, A. (2016). Manajemen Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan. Prenada Media Group.

Suyanto, & Djihad, H. (2009). Menjadi Guru Profesional: Strategi Meningkatkan Kualifikasi dan Kualitas Guru di Era Global. Erlangga.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-11

How to Cite

Sri Agustina Ratnawati, Ria Rafianti, Refli Surya Barkara, & Muhammad Afrillyan Dwi Syahputra. (2024). HUBUNGAN KONFLIK TERHADAP PROFESIONALITAS KERJA GURU UPT SMPN 10 TAPUNG KABUPATEN KAMPAR. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Kearifan Lokal, 4(6), 1009–1018. Retrieved from https://jipkl.com/index.php/JIPKL/article/view/198

Issue

Section

Articles